Cube Roots
and
Other Radicals
Square roots ask what
squared is the radicand. A geometric explanation is that given the area of a
square, what’s the side length? A
geometric explanation of a cube root is given the volume of a cube, what’s the
side length. The way you find the volume
of a cube is multiply the length by itself three times (cube it).
The way we write cube
root is similar to square roots, with one very big difference, the index.
There actually is an
index for a square root, but we don’t write the two. It is just assumed to be there.
Warning: When writing cube roots, or other roots, be
careful to write the index in the proper place.
If not, what you will write will look like multiplication and you can
confuse yourself. When writing by hand,
this is an easy thing to do.
To simplify a square root
you factor the radicand and look for the largest perfect square. To simplify a cubed root you factor the
radicand and find the largest perfect cube.
A perfect cube is a number times itself three times. The first ten are 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216,
343, 512, 729, 1,000.
Let’s see an example:
Simplify:
Factor the radicand, 16, find the largest perfect
cube, which is 8.
The cube root of eight is just two.
The following is true,
,
only if
Arithmetic with other
radicals, like cube roots, work the same as they do with square roots. We will multiply the rational numbers
together, then the irrational numbers together, and then see if simplification can
occur.
Two cubed is just eight and the cube root of two cubed
is the cube root of eight.
The cube root of eight is just two.
Negatives and cube roots: The square
root of a negative number is imagery.
There isn’t a real number times itself that is negative because, well a
negative squared is positive. Cubed
numbers, though, can be negative.
So the cube root of a
negative number is, well, a negative number.
Other indices (plural of index): The index tells you what power of a base to look
for. For example, the 6th
root is looking for a perfect 6th number, like 64. Sixty four is two to the sixth power.
A few points to make
clear.
·
If the index is
even and the radicand is negative, the number is irrational.
·
If the radicand
does not contain a factor that is a perfect power of the index, the number is
irrational
·
All operations,
including rationalizing the denominator, work just as they do with square
roots.
Rationalizing the Denominator:
Consider the following:
If we multiply by the
cube root of three, we get this:
Since 9 is not a perfect
cube, the denominator is still irrational.
Instead, we need to multiply by the cube root of nine.
Since twenty seven is a perfect cube, this can be
simplified.
And always make sure to reduce if possible.
This is a bit tricky, to
be sure. The way the math is written
does not offer us a clear insight into how to manage the situation. However, the topic we will see next, rational
exponents, will make this much clearer.
Practice Problems:
Simplify or perform the indicated operations:
An interesting session. Another way to approach these problems, eg., #5 ,is to convert everything to exponents: square root of seven becomes seven to the one-half power. the cube root of 7 in the denominator becomes seven to the minus one-third power. Then combine the terms to 7 to the three sixths power times seven to the minus two-sixths power. this simplifies to 7 to the one-sixth power, i.e., the sixth root of 7.
It’s a good exercise to check one’s work with a calculator….Everybody’s different, so i won’t go into that…
Any opinion?