Rational Exponents & Other Roots

Rational exponents, like an exponent of 2/3, can be extremely confusion.  How do you raise a number to the 2/3rds power anyway?  If you’re only learning what to do, how to manipulate them, without understanding what the notation really means, this confusion is almost insurmountable.

This page is designed to help you understand what rational exponents, and other roots (indices) mean, and how they’re related.  This will help you to have an easier time dealing with math that uses this notation, but also remember and better understand the math.

The tabs below organize the resources at your disposal.  Read through, and take notes from, the information in the first tab.  You can use the lesson tab to download a PowerPoint less, which can help provide further clarity.  Try the assignment to test your understanding, then watch the video to help you gain greater insight and to help you compress what you understand.

If you’re a teacher and would like to have an organized, easy to use and reference zip file of all of the materials found on this page, and materials not published on this site, consider downloading the Exponents Packet.

rational exponents

Rational Exponents

Number Unit

In the last section we looked at some expressions like, “What is the third root of twenty-seven, squared?”  The math is kind of ugly looking.

2723$\sqrt[3]{{27}^{2}}$

The procedures are clunky and it is very easy to lose sight of the objective.  What this expression is asking is what number cubed is twenty-seven squared.  You could always square the 27, to arrive at 729 and see if that is a perfect cube.

There is a much more elegant way to go about this type of calculation.  Turns out if we rewrite this expression with a rational exponent, life gets easier.

2723=272/3$\sqrt[3]{{27}^{2}}={27}^{2/3}$

These two statements are the same.  They ask the same question, what number cubed is twenty-seven squared?

By now you should be familiar with perfect cubes and squares.  Hopefully you’re also familiar with higher powers of 2 and 3, as well as a few others.  For example, you should recognize that 625 is 54.${5}^{4}.$ If you don’t know that yet, a cheat sheet might be helpful.

Let’s look at our expression again.  If you notice that 27 is a perfect cube, then you can rewrite it like this:

272/3(33)2/3${27}^{2/3}\to {\left({3}^{3}\right)}^{2/3}$

Maybe you see what’s going to happen next, but if not, we have a power raised to another here, we can multiply those exponents.  Three times two-thirds is two.  This becomes three squared.

(33)2/332=9${\left({3}^{3}\right)}^{2/3}\to {3}^{2}=9$

Not too bad!  We factor, writing the base of twenty-seven as an exponent with a power that matches the denominator of the other exponent, multiply, reduce, done!

Let’s look at another.

Simplify:

6253/4${625}^{3/4}$

We mentioned earlier that 625 was a power of 5, the fourth power of five.  That’s the key to making these simple.  Let’s rewrite 625 as a power of five.

(54)3/4${\left({5}^{4}\right)}^{3/4}$

We can multiply those exponents, giving us five-cubed, or 125.  Much cleaner than finding the fourth root of six hundred and twenty-five cubed.

What about something that doesn’t work out so, well, pretty?  Something where the base cannot be rewritten as an exponent that matches the denominator?

323/4${32}^{3/4}$

This is where proficiency and familiarity with powers of two comes to play.  Thirty-two is a power of two, just not the fourth power, but the fifth.

(25)3/4${\left({2}^{5}\right)}^{3/4}$

If we multiplied these exponents together we end up with something that isn’t so pretty, 215/4.${2}^{15/4}.$ We could rewrite this by simplifying the exponent, but there’s a better way.  Consider the following, and note that we broke the five twos into a group of four and another group of one.

(25)3/4=(2124)3/4${\left({2}^{5}\right)}^{3/4}={\left({2}^{1}\cdot {2}^{4}\right)}^{3/4}$

Now we’d have to multiply the exponents inside the parenthesis by ¾$¾$, and will arrive at:

23/423${2}^{3/4}\cdot {2}^{3}$

Notice that 23/4${2}^{3/4}$ is irrational, so not much we can do with it, but two cubed is eight.  Let’s write the rational number first, and rewrite that irrational number as a radical expression:

8234,or884$8\sqrt[4]{{2}^{3}},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}or\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}8\sqrt[4]{8}$.

There’s an even easier way to think about these rational exponents.  I’d like to introduce something called Logarithmic Counting.  For those who don’t know what logarithms are, that might sound scary.

Do you remember learning how to multiply by 5s…how you’d skip count?  (5, 10, 15, 20, …)  Logarithmic counting is the same way, except with exponents.  For example, by 2:  2, 4, 8, 16, 32, …  Well, what’s the fourth step of 2 when logarithmically counting?  It’s 16, right?  

Let’s look at 163/4${16}^{3/4}$.  See the denominator of four?  That means we’re looking for a fourth root, a number times itself four times that equals 16.  The three, in the numerator, it says, what number is three of the four steps on the way to sixteen?

2     4     8    16

Above is how we get to sixteen by multiplying a number by itself four times.  Do you see the third step is eight?

Let’s see how our procedure looks:

Procedure 1:

163/4=(24)3/4${16}^{3/4}={\left({2}^{4}\right)}^{3/4}$

(24)3/4=241×34=23,or8.${\left({2}^{4}\right)}^{3/4}={2}^{\frac{4}{1}×\frac{3}{4}}={2}^{3},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}or\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}8.$

Procedure 2:

163/4=1634${16}^{3/4}=\sqrt[4]{{16}^{3}}$

1634=(24)34$\sqrt[4]{{16}^{3}}=\sqrt[4]{{\left({2}^{4}\right)}^{3}}$

(24)34=244×244×244$\sqrt[4]{{\left({2}^{4}\right)}^{3}}=\sqrt[4]{{2}^{4}}×\sqrt[4]{{2}^{4}}×\sqrt[4]{{2}^{4}}$

244×244×244=2×2×2,or8.$\sqrt[4]{{2}^{4}}×\sqrt[4]{{2}^{4}}×\sqrt[4]{{2}^{4}}=2×2×2,\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}or\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}8.$

The most elegant way is to realize the 16 is the fourth power of 2, and the fraction ¾$¾$ is asking us for the third entry. What is 3/4s of the way to 16 when multiplying (exponents)?

Let’s look at 6252/3.${625}^{2/3}.$ Let’s do this three ways, first with radical notation, then by evaluating the base and simplifying the exponents, and then by thinking about what is two thirds of the way to 625.

Now this is going to be a tricky problem because 625 is NOT a perfect cube.  It is the fourth power of 5, though, which means that 125 (which is five-cubed) times five is 625.

6252/3=62523${625}^{2/3}=\sqrt[3]{{625}^{2}}$

62523=(54)23583$\sqrt[3]{{625}^{2}}=\sqrt[3]{{\left({5}^{4}\right)}^{2}}\to \sqrt[3]{{5}^{8}}$

583=53×53×523$\sqrt[3]{{5}^{8}}=\sqrt[3]{{5}^{3}×{5}^{3}×{5}^{2}}$

53×53×523=5×5253,or25253$\sqrt[3]{{5}^{3}×{5}^{3}×{5}^{2}}=5×5\sqrt[3]{25},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}or\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}25\sqrt[3]{25}$

Pretty ugly!

Exponential Notation:

6252/3=(54)2/3${625}^{2/3}={\left({5}^{4}\right)}^{2/3}$

(54)2/3=(53×51)2/3${\left({5}^{4}\right)}^{2/3}={\left({5}^{3}×{5}^{1}\right)}^{2/3}$

(53×51)2/3=52×52/3${\left({5}^{3}×{5}^{1}\right)}^{2/3}={5}^{2}×{5}^{2/3}$

52×52/3=25×52/3,or25253${5}^{2}×{5}^{2/3}=25×{5}^{2/3},\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}or\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}\text{\hspace{0.17em}}25\sqrt[3]{25}$

A little better, but still a few sticky points.

Now our third method.

6252/3${625}^{2/3}$ asks, “What is two thirds of the way to 625, for a cubed number?”

This 625 isn’t cubed, but a factor of it is.

6252/3=(125×5)2/3${625}^{2/3}={\left(125×5\right)}^{2/3}$
This could also be written as:

1252/3×52/3${125}^{2/3}×{5}^{2/3}$

I am certain that 5 to the two-thirds power is irrational because, well, five is a prime number.  Let’s deal with the other portion.

The steps to 125 are:  5    25     125

The second step is 25.

1252/3×52/3=25×52/3${125}^{2/3}×{5}^{2/3}=25×{5}^{2/3}$

To summarize the denominator of the rational exponent is the index of a radical expression.  The numerator is an exponent for the base.  How you tackle the expressions is entirely up to you, but I would suggest proficiency in multiple methods as sometimes the math lends itself nicely to one method but not another.

.

<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" style="background-color:#"> <semantics> <mrow></mrow> <annotation encoding="MathType-MTEF">MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGcaa@35F6@ </annotation> </semantics> </math>Simplify the following:1.  (16x16)3/42.   1285/63.   1253−−−−√54.   323/55.  (81x27)2/3<math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" style="background-color:#"> <semantics> <mtable columnalign="left"> <mtr> <mtd> <mtext>Simplify the following:</mtext> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mtext>1</mtext><mtext>.  </mtext><msup> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow> <mn>16</mn><msup> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mn>16</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> <mrow> <mn>3</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>4</mn></mrow> </msup> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mn>2.</mn><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><msup> <mn>128</mn> <mrow> <mn>5</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>6</mn></mrow> </msup> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mn>3.</mn><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mroot> <mrow> <msup> <mrow> <mn>125</mn></mrow> <mn>3</mn> </msup> </mrow> <mn>5</mn> </mroot> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mn>4.</mn><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><msup> <mn>32</mn> <mrow> <mn>3</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>5</mn></mrow> </msup> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mrow></mrow> </mtd> </mtr> <mtr> <mtd> <mn>5.</mn><mtext> </mtext><mtext> </mtext><msup> <mrow><mo>(</mo> <mrow> <mn>81</mn><msup> <mi>x</mi> <mrow> <mn>27</mn></mrow> </msup> </mrow> <mo>)</mo></mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn><mo>/</mo><mn>3</mn></mrow> </msup> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> <annotation encoding="MathType-MTEF">MathType@MTEF@5@5@+= feaagKart1ev2aqatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXatLxBI9gBaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqtubsr 4rNCHbGeaGqiVu0Je9sqqrpepC0xbbL8F4rqqrFfpeea0xe9Lq=Jc9 vqaqpepm0xbba9pwe9Q8fs0=yqaqpepae9pg0FirpepeKkFr0xfr=x fr=xb9adbaqaaeGaciGaaiaabeqaamaabaabaaGceaqabeaacaqGtb GaaeyAaiaab2gacaqGWbGaaeiBaiaabMgacaqGMbGaaeyEaiaabcca caqG0bGaaeiAaiaabwgacaqGGaGaaeOzaiaab+gacaqGSbGaaeiBai aab+gacaqG3bGaaeyAaiaab6gacaqGNbGaaeOoaaqaaiaabgdacaqG UaGaaeiiaiaabccadaqadaqaaiaaigdacaaI2aGaamiEamaaCaaale qabaGaaGymaiaaiAdaaaaakiaawIcacaGLPaaadaahaaWcbeqaaiaa iodacaGGVaGaaGinaaaaaOqaaaqaaaqaaiaaikdacaGGUaGaaGPaVl aaykW7caaMc8UaaGymaiaaikdacaaI4aWaaWbaaSqabeaacaaI1aGa ai4laiaaiAdaaaaakeaaaeaaaeaaaeaacaaIZaGaaiOlaiaaykW7ca aMc8UaaGPaVpaakeaabaGaaGymaiaaikdacaaI1aWaaWbaaSqabeaa caaIZaaaaaqaaiaaiwdaaaaakeaaaeaaaeaaaeaacaaI0aGaaiOlai aaykW7caaMc8UaaGPaVlaaiodacaaIYaWaaWbaaSqabeaacaaIZaGa ai4laiaaiwdaaaaakeaaaeaaaeaaaeaacaaI1aGaaiOlaiaaykW7ca aMc8+aaeWaaeaacaaI4aGaaGymaiaadIhadaahaaWcbeqaaiaaikda caaI3aaaaaGccaGLOaGaayzkaaWaaWbaaSqabeaacaaIYaGaai4lai aaiodaaaaaaaa@80AF@ </annotation> </semantics> </math>

Select Practice Problems Review

1.  (16x16)3/4${\left(16{x}^{16}\right)}^{3/4}$  A key piece of information that can make this easy is that the base, 16, is a perfect 4th power.  Four is the denominator of the exponent.  So what we will do is rewrite 24 in place of 16.

(16x16)3/4=(24x16)3/4${\left(16{x}^{16}\right)}^{3/4}={\left({2}^{4}{x}^{16}\right)}^{3/4}$

Inside the parenthesis are two bases, the 2 and the x.  Both bases get their exponents multiplied by ¾$¾$

(24x16)3/4=23x12${\left({2}^{4}{x}^{16}\right)}^{3/4}={2}^{3}{x}^{12}$

3.  12535$\sqrt[5]{{125}^{3}}$ This is a tricky problem because 125 is not a 5th power!  The first thing I’d suggest is rewriting the radical notation as an exponent, and then writing 125 as 53.

12535=(53)3/5$\sqrt[5]{{125}^{3}}={\left({5}^{3}\right)}^{3/5}$

Here we need to be delicate.  When we multiply 3 and 3/5, we get 9/5.  This is 1 and 4/5.

(53)3/5=59/55×54/5${\left({5}^{3}\right)}^{3/5}={5}^{9/5}\to 5×{5}^{4/5}$

You could leave the answer as 5 × 54/5, or rewrite it in radical notation.

12535=5545    or   5×54/5

Rational Exponents and Other Indices

Unit 1.8

Note:  The idea here is to give students various ways to read rational exponents and radical expressions with various indices.

Big Idea

Square roots, and other radical expressions, fit with exponents in the order of operations because they are exponents, written with different notation. Sometimes, writing an expression in rational exponent form provides an easy avenue to simplification, where other times, having the expression written in radical form make simplification easier.

Key Knowledge

The ability to translate from rational exponent to radical form, and from radical form to exponential form without confusion is a key skill.  Students should do so on their own without prompting when one form has them confused.

Pro-Tip
(for students)

When stuck or confused, rewrite the expression in a different form.  Also, these problems are written to be easily simplified. The denominator of the rational exponent will likely reduce, often entirely, if the base is factored.